Can packs, troops, teams or crews participate in political rallies?

The Boy Scouts of America might be the most patriotic organization in the U.S.

But we don’t endorse any one political party. You could say that rather than being pro-left or pro-right, the Boy Scouts of America is pro-America.

The same applies to your pack, troop, team, post, ship or crew. You and your Scouts should Do Your Duty to Country but not by endorsing any one candidate.

During election years, the line between patriotism and political favoritism becomes thin, making it important to remind you of the BSA’s official policy on Scout participation in political rallies.

Fact is, Scout units like the one pictured above are permitted to provide a color guard flag ceremony, in uniform, at political events. Troop 605 from Rocky River, Ohio, provided that service Wednesday at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. (Nice job, Nick S., Tristan A., Grayson N. and Erik H.!)

The troop served as color guard and then immediately left the stage and the premises. They provided a patriotic service and departed before things got political.

What about the other side of the aisle? A pack or troop in the Philadelphia area could, conceivably, provide the same service for next week’s Democratic National Convention if convention planners and a Scout unit were interested.

Here are some Frequently Asked Questions and the BSA’s official answers:

Q: Could a pack, troop, team or crew provide a color guard flag ceremony for a candidate’s public speaking event or rally?

A: Yes. But, BSA Policy requires our adult and youth members in uniform to leave immediately after the presentation of colors and the Pledge of Allegiance. Should they want to stay they must do so as individuals, not Scouting representatives. That means they would have to change out of their uniforms.

Q: So Scouts and Scouters can’t stand on the platform for the remainder of the speech or presentation?

A: No, they should not remain on the speakers’ platform or in a conspicuous location where media could construe their presence as an endorsement or symbol of support.

Q: Why is this the rule?

A: The policy is meant to prevent someone from using our brand to convey support of a candidate or ideology. This prevents Scouts from being used by any party in campaign advertisements or materials.

Q: So then why is it OK to even present the colors or lead the Pledge of Allegiance at all?

A: Those are displays of loyalty to the nation, something the BSA has always endorsed. Regardless of the outcome of the political race, the candidate and supporters pledge allegiance to the U.S. Because of this, it is always acceptable and deemed to be a part of the civic process. Also, this “service” is offered to any party, regardless of political affiliation.

Q: Can Scouts and Scouters pose for photos with political candidates at these events?

A: Yes. But photos of candidates or Scouts in uniform or BSA marks and logos are not allowed in political campaign materials of any kind.

Q: Can adult leaders or Venturers who are 18 or older vote in elections?

A: Not only can they — they should! This policy isn’t meant to limit the freedom of thought or action of any official or member acting as an individual. Scouters and Venturers shouldn’t wear their uniform to the polling place, but they should vote for whichever candidate they prefer. That’s all part of being a good citizen — something the BSA has taught for more than a century.

Q: What can Scout leaders do to support this policy?

A: Volunteers (and professionals) must be alert to situations that would imply that the BSA favors one candidate or party over another. Strict observance of our long-standing policy against the active participation of uniformed Scouts and leaders in political events is mandatory.

Q: Does Scouting still teach patriotism and citizenship?

A: Yes! The Boy Scouts of America teaches the ideals of patriotism and good citizenship as required to fulfill its purpose.

Photo via John K. Fabsits, director of field service for the Greater Cleveland Council.

Editor’s note: This post was originally posted in March 2012 and has been updated for 2016.


  1. WHY – (like so many other issues and questions in Scouting) does this have SO MUCH GRAY area ? Yes – you can do this BUT don’t do this !!! Why not just “YES” or “NO” ??? ( i.e -You can be there and post the colors – BUT you have to leave then – yeah – right ) and (i.e. -you can take pics with them in uniform – but they can’t be used ) – too much confusion and gray area left for individuals to do what they want anyways — Vs. – POLICY says — WE DON’T TAKE PART IN or SUPPORT POLITICIANS, political issues, or events !

    • I’m always happy for as much ‘gray area’ (not the campfire kind) as the BSA allows us, so that thoughtful leaders can make local decisions in unique circumstances, based on Scouting principles, that serve the movement best. Very few situations in life are cookie-cutter, so I’m always glad when our responses aren’t.

    • It sounds as if President Trump shredded the above rules, and did incalculable damage to the Boy Scouts of America’s reputation, with his partisan, divisive statements at the National Jamboree. I respectfully ask that the BSA promptly issue a statement clarifying BSA’s non-political stance and emphasizing that the President did not clear his remarks with the BSA beforehand. President Trump’s statements were disrespectful to Scouting and our children. And yes, I would say the same thing if any other politician or officeholder, regardless of political ideology or party, were to do a similar thing.

      • Well said. Not sure if he hadn’t heard of the Boy Scouts or if he somehow thought he was at a campaign rally….

      • I completely agree, BSA needs to make a statement. I’m having trouble defending an organization that does so much good for my son right now

      • They did issue a statement, but IMHO, it didn’t go nearly far enough. All of those scouts were forced to stand there in complete disregard for the BSA rules about political rallies. It was appalling. And the guy on the podium, in uniform, who laughed and clapped right along…..

  2. A few years ago, scouts from our troop were asked to participate at a local political debate. As is usual, the scouts were asked to act as color guard, a service that is usual and customary, so the unit was happy to do so. The scouts where also asked to serve as “time keepers” for the debate.. The scouts would monitor the time, showing the candidates time remaining using a flip chart. The moderator was the final time keeper. The scouts were asked to do this because of Scouting’s reputation for Trustworthiness. All local elections in our city are non-partisan, so there was no “show of support” for any political party. I am curious to hear others’ opinions as to whether our scouts were operating within the terms of the policy.

    • My opinion (and only my opinion) is if they were working for the debate, and not supporting the candidates (clapping/cheering from the crowd or even wearing a pin) – they were doing a service to the community.

  3. Thanks for the clarity! Over the years I’ve gotten to meet two governors, a cabinet secretary, a senator, and a candidate for present – all thanks to scouting. I’m happy to say we were always in line with all these policies, and I hope that scouts are getting to do that same in the next few months. Citizenship is not a spectator sport.

  4. Steve – seriously? It’s really that hard to follow? All Boy Scouts are encouraged to participate in the political process. The Boy Scouts of America, as an organization, do not endorse any political candidate and any Scout who does so is not a representation of BSA as a whole.

    Seems pretty cut-and-dry to me.

  5. Doesn’t seem gray to me. Present the Colors, then change clothes if you want to stay for the rally. Go ahead and take a picture with the political figure – but that political figure can not send out a mailing saying, “The BSA supports me, so should you”.

    • even “mailing” is gray….how about a Facebook ad?…email ad?…..and how do you even control that photo if a candidate’s aid also snaps a shot at the same time?

    • So I would assume that it is against BSA policy for Scouts to run a mock election of the current candidates at a Troop meeting.

  6. @ Steve Foster – I would think if the debate included (or invited) all candidates for a general (or non-partisan as in your case) election that would be OK. You are supporting the election process, not a candidate or a party. But if it was just one party (i.e. Republic primary) that would be problematic. Just my opinion…

  7. I’m curious why the restriction against wearing the uniform when you go to vote? At least where I live, you are not allowed to campaign for votes within a certain distance of a polling place, so the endorsement of one candidate or another is a moot issue by then.

  8. Is this policy against all uniform pieces? For example, I recently saw someone at a local republican event wearing and eagle scout uniform neck bolo. I told him he probably shouldn’t be wearing it, but he rebuffed me saying it was not full uniform.
    Should he have taken it off, and should he refrain from wearing it in the future?

  9. Am I understanding correctly? It is OK for Boy Scouts to perform the flag ceremony at a Republican US Senate Debate since this service is available to any political party that asks for it. On that same reasoning, is it OK to to have Cub Scouts distribute flyers advertising a Republican Caucus as a part of a weekly den meeting since that service would be available to all other political parties if they asked for it? Is it Ok for Boy Scouts to do the flag ceremony at the Republican Caucus and then help with collecting/distributing ballots? Above it says after performing the flag ceremony the scouts would need to leave or change clothing. It doesn’t seem practical to to do this since they would need to also retire the flag an hour or so later. Wouldn’t it be OK for them to remain seated in the back so they are ready to retire flag or assist with other duties?

    • “is it OK to to have Cub Scouts distribute flyers advertising a Republican Caucus as a part of a weekly den meeting since that service would be available to all other political parties if they asked for it? Is it Ok for Boy Scouts … at the Republican Caucus and then help with collecting/distributing ballots?”

      Seems like a pretty obvious “no.” In providing a color guard, it’s clear the scouts are offering a non-partisan patriotic service.; however, distributing fliers is work on behalf of the campaign(s).

  10. This seems to be really flawed logic. My view is that not only should Scouts refrain from participating in partisan politics, as the BSA outlines it, they should refrain from any “appearance” of partisan politics as well. Sure, you may offer a color guard as a service to all, but both the people who attend that political event, and the average person who may see it in the media, won’t know that. All they will see are the Boy Scouts posting colors at a Democratic/Republican rally and infer that the BSA supports that candidate or party.

    If it’s a public debate that involves candidates from various parties, that truly is non-partisan since it’s a public service that promotes citizenship while not promoting a specific political party. But a political rally? Hardly.

    Besides, you’re doing a disservice to your Scouts themselves. Whether they are 12 or 17, they won’t have the maturity to differentiate the intricacies of this issue. Throw in the political affiliation of Scouts’ parents and the potential for an inexperienced Scoutmaster to inject his political views (and we all know they do), and it’s a recipe for disaster.

    Let’s make it black & white: No uniformed participation at partisan political events. Period.

    • The maturity can easily be handled by the adult leaders…..if the Republican candidate seeks out the color guard and the unit accepts, the leader should use all efforts to get the youth to do the same for the other Democratic candidate. My parents did not let me see the local favorite candidate when my elementary school attended a rally (I was one of two that did not go) but the other went to the other candidate (I sat at school for both rallies for the principle of the matter). That’s a life lesson, either do both or none.

  11. I would like to know why about a dozen BSA were standing at the Mitt Romney’s airplane for photos in full uniform in a show of support for Mitt Romney, no flag in site. Is this not a violation even in Utah?

        • Thanks. I’m far from the expert on this, but that looks to me like a violation of BSA policy. Nothing we can do about that, however, other than tell people to please be cognizant of the message that kind of image sends to the populace.

        • My comment is directed toward Bryan’s response to the photos. Why is there “Nothing we can do about that, however, other than tell people to please be cognizant of the message that kind of image sends to the populace”? Yes, there is something that can be done about it.

          The BSA has a troop number, knows where the photo was taken and what the leader looks like. There should be no trouble at all finding out the identity of that leader. Whether through National or through his Council or District, that leader needs to be contacted directly — for a number of reasons, his toleration of incorrect unforming practices among them — and told he’s violating BSA policy.

          Also, realize those boys didn’t just accidentally find themselves lined up along the bottom of those steps. Someone put them there — probably someone with the candidate’s campaign. This is a recurring problem. Four years ago, when John McCain announced Sarah Palin as his running mate, there were six Scouts and Scouters in uniform standing behind the Senator, in full view of TV cameras. Of course candidates want to be seen with Scouts because of what Scouting represents.

          I think it would be a prudent action for the National BSA to contact both presidential candidates and let them know they should NOT utilize Scouts at their campaign events in any capacity.

        • Well, since they reopened the can, the picture show the troop # as a description, Troop 315 Other than that, and the uniform violation, I would like to add, the Mormon church has more Scouts than any other affiliation. Mitt Romney, if I remember correctly is Mormon. That is one connection, and perhaps the reason behind scouts being at that event

    • Allen,
      There was not a scout, or scouter, there in full uniform. Not a single one of them was wearing the official BSA uniform pants. None of them were wearing their neckerchief properly. According to the Insignia Guide, the neckerchief is either worn over a turned under collar or under an open collar, but NEVER over an open collar. You are either in uniform or out of uniform. You either wear the uniform correctly or you are out of uniform. Thus, none of them wer “in full uniform” as you put it. But that is beside the point. Why were they there? Because their leader was unaware of the policy or knew about it and chose to violate it in order for his scouts to meet the candidates.

      • Steve, I think you are missing the point. The policy doesn’t say “full uniform”, it says “uniform”. The uniform shirt is more than enough to make sure that everyone know these are Boy Scouts. And that is clearly a violation of the spirit of the rule. No gray zone here at all.

        And frederickscouter has it right, any clear violation of the policy such as this should have clear and immediate response from National. That troop should have it’s leaders at that event out of scouting permanently.

        • Chuck,
          You missed MY point. Allen said they were in “full uniform”. I was pointing out that they were not in FULL uniform. Nitpicky, but 100% true. I hate seeing scouts wear part of the uniform and be accepted as being in “full uniform”. If you are going to wear the uniform, show it the respect it is due as a symbol of our organization and wear it CORRECTLY.

          Yes, they were in violation of BSA policy. Not debating that. I even acknowledged that in my post.

          Does the leader need to be banned from BSA for life over this? No. Educated on policy? Definately.

  12. I think the bigger picture is getting lost in the “official” details. As scout leaders we are always looking for ways to provide practical, real-world situations for our scouts to learn from. I imagine this event came about with the intention of teaching a troop the importance of being involved in the political process as well as give them a once in a lifetime chance to meet the future President of the U.S. Scout leaders try to promote an awareness of our civic responsiblities and encourage scouts to “get in the game” and participate. How can scouts ever begin to do their duty to country when we tell them to be involved and engaged in furthering the cause of our country, but in the next breath say “but don’t wear your uniform because it might give the impression that you actually support the republican ideals and someone might be offended by that!” Maybe instead of focussing on the fact that their neckerchief is on a little crooked we can see the broader message being taught, that we need to show our “scout spirit” and stand by our public officials of either party and offer our support and encouragement as they try to do their duty to our country by serving in public office despite the great personal sacrifice that is required. That takes courage which is yet another scouting ideal we like to teach!

    • The difference is endorsement. The military has the same policy. I was free to preform a flag ceremony but then leave or remove my uniform. I could endorse a candidate and even campaign for one but not in uniform.

    • The prohibition against using BSA to advocate any political position or candidate goes back to 1910.

      As a commissioner, I would say If a commissioned leader willfully violates the principle or has members of his unit violate it after being warned about it, he might be subject to having his commission revoked.

      That’s fancy language for being asked to leave Scouting. There are lots of reasons for being asked to leave Scouting beyond violating YPP.

  13. What if a candidate for office (partisan or non-partisan) wants to list his or her Scouting volunteer service as one of their qualifications? Such as “President of Rotary Club…Library Board volunteer…Assistant Scoutmaster…” etc.?

    • That should be fine, since that is merely an individual describing an objective fact about his or her personal experience in the same way that someone would list a particular qualification on a résumé. The important point is that a person listing their experience does not imply that the Scouting organization itself endorses that person’s candidacy. It’s similar to listing a previous employer on your résumé — it says nothing about whether or not that employer endorses you for political office.

  14. So if I want to canvass for a candidate and bring my son with me, he can’t wear his uniform, right? I can see both the pros and cons of that position, but in the end it’s the BSA who decides. Personally I think it says something really positive about the canvasser if their child is in Scouting but I guess it might upset someone who is not a fan of that particular political affiliation.

  15. Since we are taking about National uniform policy, what about people using their position in Scouting advocating for political campaigns? The situation in question involves Richard Bolingbroke, the Commissioner for the San Diego Area Council, writing a Rebuttal to the Argument Against Proposition 8 (in other words, supporting Proposition 8) in the 2008 California election, He specifically stated in his rebuttal that he is representing the Boy Scouts of America in an official capacity. Can someone please tell me if there was any action taken against Mr. Bolingbroke for violating the terms of his office by using his position with the San Diego Area Council to advocate for a political position. The funny thing was in the 2008 election, I had no idea that the BSA had a specific position on the legality of same sex marriage.

  16. I have a question as to the legality of giving a free booth to the boy scouts during a non-political event run by a political party. I would appreciate if someone could point me to the rules specifically to cover this situation and the direct donation from a political party to help the Boy Scouts ie funding the local Soap Box Derby or just providing money for a trip to the local zoo.

    1. A local Cub Scout troop asked for a free booth at our Strawberry Festival. The local Republicans run the festival however no campaigning is allowed. No local, state, or Federal Republican candidate is allowed to campaign, or even wear a name tag that says “Mayor”, Town Council”, Board of Education, or Senator”. Most people think the town runs the event as we only have a small sign that the Strawberry Festival is produced by your local Republican Town Committee. The local newspapers all do stories on the festival and usually say that the Strawberry Festival is produced by the local Republicans. There is a free admission and we sell craft tables and food to make money for the campaign. We offer any civic group in town a free booth. The scouts were going to come and recruit as they have a small Den and sell candy to make money for a trip. It’s a great opportunity as we get 10,000 people over the weekend. The local Democratic Party objected and claimed we were violating a BSA policy even though we had agreed not to take pictures of their booth or any scout or leader or in any way publicize their attendance or use them in our campaign literature. The Cub Scouts pulled out and the leaders had to explain to 10 very upset young men why they were denied the ability to raise money for a trip.

    Should the Cub Scouts have been allowed to have a booth under these circumstances?

    2. Because we were heartbroken for these young men, we decided (The local Republicans) to have a booth at the local town fair (carnival). We sold our Strawberry soda and had a sign at the booth that every dollar raised would be going to this troop. We sold about $1,000 profit of our soda are planning on giving it to the troop with little fanfare. At no time that we were selling the soda was a scout present. However we had a sign at the booth that all proceeds would be donated to the troop. We were campaigning at the booth. The sale of soda was tangential to the campaign. We need to sell something to have a booth and we chose not to keep the money. We also wanted to make up for the fact that they were denied the opportunity to fund raise for themselves.

    Did we violate any BSA rules by giving them money or advertising at the booth that we were giving them money.?

    Thanks for any answers in advance. and again. Where can I get the official rules about political interaction. It seems they all revolve around being in uniform or giving the appearance of the boy scouts supporting a political party. Not of a political party supporting the boy scouts.

    • Cary, this whole thing seems to fall into a gray area. I am not speaking on behalf of the national organization, but I can provide my personal view, based on how I would have handled the situation as a Scout leader…

      I think your closing comments were pretty much on the mark. It’s unreasonable to expect a non-BSA entity to be aware of BSA rules, so in that case, your organization did nothing wrong. It’s up to the Scout leaders to be aware of the rules and avoid potential problem situations, so the den leader and Cubmaster are the ones potentially violating rules, not your group.

      Should the Cub Scout pack have asked to be included in your event? Probably not. You state that it is clearly advertised as being sponsored by the local Republican Party. Moreover, you indicated it was a fundraiser (“… We sell craft tables and food to make money for the campaign.”). Despite the fact it’s a community-related event, your party sponsored it for political purposes (i.e., a fundraiser), which would have been enough of a red flag to keep me from asking my Scouts to be included, had I been in the den leader’s position.

      I’ll also add that if the local Democratic Party was unhappy, their concerns should have been directed to the Scout unit, not you … but we both know that’s not how politics works.

      The second situation you describe is even more convoluted, and contradictory. You start by saying that the party was “heartbroken” over what happened at the festival, so you decided to have a booth at the carnival to sell soda to benefit the den … then you say you used it as a campaigning opportunity and wouldn’t have been able to have the booth had you not sold the soda. It almost sounds as if the soda sales were simply a means to an end. You also say that the money was to be given with little fanfare, yet you advertised to carnival-goers what you intended to do with proceeds. Whatever the reason, it probably would have been better for the party just to quietly make a donation to the den without tying it to the booth sales. I am unaware of any BSA policy that would have prohibited the Cub Scouts from accepting it.

      Those of us in Scouting seem to constantly debate the intricacies of this particular BSA policy, but I think the overall intent of having such a rule is simply to prevent Scouts from becoming pawns in the activities of parties and candidates. Whether intentional or accidental, unfortunately, that seems to be what has happened in this case.

  17. I recently was at a scout camp and displayed were certain flags which represent a certain political view–should they have been displayed?

  18. As far as the sales at the festival, a unit fundraising form needed to get filled out before they sold one soda, that way their council could approve or decline their project.

    • They’re a non-scouting group who donated money to the Pack, without involvement of the Pack other than to receive the donation, so there was no need to fill out the unit money-earning application. Had the Cub Scout Pack been running that booth, then absolutely they should have filled out the form and submitted it to council ahead of time.

      The issue for that booth was more that the outside group, who was also campaigning for a political purpose at the same booth, put up signage that they were donating the proceeds to a BSA unit. While perhaps unintentional, that amounts to co-opting the Scouting brand and could allow someone to believe that the BSA supports whatever cause that was being campaigned for at the same booth.

  19. Mitt Romney is a member of the church of Latter Day Saints. Don’t they have a set of different rules? Or the picture was taken as part of a different reason instead of campaigning.

  20. As scouts in the 70s our troop was paid by various candidates, to put up lawn signs and posters on poles. Yes and take them down after the election. We did this out of uniform with adult supervision. Today as a leader my Explorer group has been asked get involved in city elections. I have refrained from getting them involved because our program is partially funded by the city. I want to avoid any repercussions if a council member is slighted. Just my experience with this issue.

  21. This policy is pretty fuzzy. Scouts can appear in photos with candidates, but not campaign literature? What’s the diff? It’s still gives the appearance of an endorsement. I saw Scouts at a John McCain rally during his presidential run and immediately wondered if the BSA sanctioned such activity. Apparently so.

    • Just a few years ago, campaigns were primarily a paper function. And, this policy comes from then, when it was pretty obvious if an image of a scout was being used by the candidate’s campaign committee to imply endorsement (e.g., they payed to have it printed on their fliers etc …) vs. part of the generic news cycle (e.g., the picture made it into a newspaper or magazine as part of the journalists’ footage).

      Now with social media campaigns, more of what we used to consider “pressroom” images make their way into the candidate’s home page. So tech has muddied the waters a little. Still, most of us have the smarts to understand that a scout might be part of a rally, but the BSA is not endorsing that candidate.

  22. Bryan, thank you again for the clarification. Moreover, the use of the Uniform is a clearer sign to the BSA and its participation, regardless how innocent.

    A wise man told me years ago, there are two topics not to discuss in a public setting, anywhere, anytime: politics and Religion.

    This applies here and well as participating therein.

    Take the clearer road here: DO NOT PARTICIPATE regardless of the civics lesson.

    • I don’t think that’s the message I want to send my boys. (Especially the ones who will be voting.) If shedding a uniform is going to prevent them from hearing what a candidate has to say, I’d rather forgive them for the P-R foible.

  23. How does wearing a BSA uniform to a polling place show favoritism? If anything wearing a uniform to a polling place is only a sign that the scouting organization supports the American political system indicating BSA’s commitment to good citizenship.

  24. I encouraged my Cub Scouts to be patriotic during elections by having them pass out flyers reminding people that it is their duty and privilege as citizens of this great nation to vote. We didn’t mention any names or parties, just the date to vote. They were happy and proud to pass out the flyers.

  25. Personally, I think that the policy is quite clear. However, if you are uncertain or something brings up a red flag in your mind, you have two options: (1) Give your DE or Council Exec a call and ask for guidance. Whatever the advice is, follow-up to that person with an email restating the situation and the advice. (2) If it brings up a red flag in your mind, and you don’t want to contact your DE or Scout Exec, then politely decline the invitation. It is that simple.

  26. Hi Bryan – I love your blog and the fantastic job your do for the B.S.A. with all of the Scouting information you present. However, the picture, taken by your Scouting Professional Associate, John K Fabsits, shows the flag displayed incorrectly. The United States flag should be on its own right when displayed in the situation shown. The order of precedence of the flags in this picture is exactly opposite of what it should be. Your point about participation at political rallies is well taken though.

  27. Our Troop just returned from BTSR in Texas and one Troop had Trump flags flying, mini walls built around the campsite and they shouted insults about opposing candidates as other Scouts walked near their camp site. There was even a shirt they or another Troop wore for their Troop that endorsed “Trump16”. It was very uncomfortable. We have pictures.

  28. I understand the policy allows and encourages participation in these types of events, but my own personal opinion on this is that participation in this particular event, this year, was a poor choice. Whether or not you are a supporter of Mr. Trump, conspicuous presence at an event with this level of controversy and negative media attention probably should have been avoided. We must ask not only whether our actions are consistent with policy, but also is it *right* for us and our organization, over the long term.

    My understanding is that Scouting is both patriotic and non-partisan. Appearing at one event but not the other, even if we tried to participate, sends a message.

    If I was the Scoutmaster, I would ask these young men if they believed the tone of the event and speakers was consistent with all twelve points of the Scout Law before participating.

  29. I have to echo the earlier points made, the 2016 election process is really getting nasty.
    BSA should stay away from any and all appearance of partisanship. The appearance at the Republican National Convention was a mistake.

    Jack Person
    District Commissioner

  30. There is a candidate in my county running for school board on a platform to forbid scouts from
    Any relationship with public schools including recruiting efforts. This is because she is anti-religion and does not believe that a group that requires reverence should be able to recruit in school. Can scouts get involved to publicize this zealot’s position and defend scouting?

  31. Hi Bryan! I am an Eagle Scout, and have searched and searched on the rules for wearing old rank patches…As an Eagle Scout, can I sew on an older Eagle Scout rank patch? There are rules for badge swapping, but the BSA website states that I may not wear the badge unless I have earned it….since I am an Eagle Scout, then am I allowed to wear an old Eagle Scout rank patch? (circa 1972-75)

    is there even an official ruling on this?

    Thanks in advance for your help!

  32. All I can say is that I have lost a great deal of respect for the BSA after its performance at the Trump rally. I cannot believe that the political support show to Trum was allowed. The national organization should make a statement condemning what happened. Otherwise, the BSA has lost its soul. Fine for individual scouts and their families to support a particular political party, obviously, but the organization should have delined Trump’s invitation to rally with him. It was outrageous and upsetting. My husband and two sons were all scouts and love their experience, but my image and respect for BSA is on the brink of collapse. BSA must remain apolitical.

  33. This president can’t seem to be trusted to act respectfully in any situation, so BSA thought it would be a great idea for him to address the scouting crowd??? Do you now explain to them what an orgy is? Explain how a man’s life can be changed by a yacht and women? Do you explain how it was appropriate (or not) to boo a former president and Senator/Secretary of State? Is that Patriotic? Is that Non-Partisan? #FAIL – you can expect my grandchildren will never darken your doorways (and many other parents are saying the same!) The saddest thing is all of the Eagle Scouts who put so much hard work into their scouting achievements and now say they are ashamed to be part of the organization. Is this worth having a man who can’t be relied upon to speak respectfuly in large crowds address a bunch of young boys and treat the like Nazi youth? REALLY???

  34. BSA allowed hateful rhetoric to be delivered from their stage yesterday to tens of thousands of young Boy Scouts, while BSA leadership offered their support of the same by simply standing there and laughing and clapping at the disgusting remarks that came out of Trump’s mouth. BSA owes President Obama, the scouts and their families, and the American public an apology. Anything short of that is a dereliction of your responsibilities to your membership, funders, and other constituents.

7 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Can Packs, Troops, Teams, or Crews Participate in Political Rallies? | Scout Wire
  2. BSA Policy Regarding Scouts at Political Rallies | Boy Scouts on Staten Island, NY
  3. When worlds collide: What are Scouts seeing on your Facebook page? « Bryan on Scouting
  4. Scouting and Politics | NAMAS
  5. Can packs, troops, teams or crews participate in political rallies? | Boy Scouts of America
  6. Scouts, Flags, and Politicians – Mark Ray | Writer
  7. County Council member Billy Shreve crosses the line…again! | Bearings

Join the conversation